Jasig is a key agreement on the GRP/GPH-NDFP Peace Negotiations

By Luis G. Jalandoni
Chairperson, NDFP Negotiating Panel
13 February 2011
The Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) is a key agreement in the peace negotiations between the Government of the Philippines (GPH, formerly designated as GRP) and the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP).
In its preamble, the JASIG stipulates that: “The primary purposes of the safety and immunity guarantees hereby adopted are to facilitate the peace negotiations, create a favorable atmosphere conducive to free discussion and free movement during the peace negotiations, and avert any incident that may jeopardize the peace negotiations.”
In other words, the JASIG is meant to test the good faith, sincerity and commitment of both the GRP/GPH and NDFP to relentlessly pursue the peace negotiations to arrive at comprehensive agreements on basic social, economic and political reforms and help pave the way for a just and lasting peace in the country.
The NDFP has dutifully complied with the JASIG by faithfully respecting the safety and immunity guarantees of all those involved (negotiators, consultants, staffers, security and other personnel) in the peace negotiations on the side of the GRP/GPH.
On the other hand, the GRP/GPH has persistently violated the JASIG with the arrests, torture, killing and disappearance of those involved on the NDFP side, from the arrest and killing of Sotero Llamas, the continuing detention of Alan Jazmines and others, and the abduction and disappearance of Leo Velasco, Prudencio Calubid and Rogelio Calubad, among others.
If the GRP/GPH cannot be trusted to comply with the JASIG, how can it be trusted to comply with substantial agreements on social, economic and political reforms?  As we have said earlier, palabra de honor or good faith is a key question in any negotiation. ###

Nearly a Year After: GPH Continues to Renege on Its Obligations under the JASIG; Now, Harasses NDFP JASIG-Protected Persons

By Luis G. Jalandoni
Chairperson, NDFP Negotiating Panel
30 January 2011
Nearly a year after resumption of formal talks last February 2011, the Government of the Philippines (GPH, formerly GRP) continues to renege on its obligations under the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG). It now harasses some of the 17 JASIG-protected persons of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP).
Last 25 January 2012, Ramon Patriarca, an NDFP-JASIG protected person, was transferred without notice to him and his counsel from regular police custody to military custody in Camp Lapu-Lapu, the base of the Visayas Central Command (CENCOM) of the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP).
After attending a court hearing, Patriarca was not returned to the Danao City jail but was suddenly brought to an incommunicado facility in Camp Lapu-Lapu. The reasons given for his transfer were his reported incitement of his fellow inmates to rebellion and an alleged intelligence information of a possible rescue attempt by the New People’s Army (NPA).
It should be recalled that Patriarca was arrested by elements of the 78th Battalion of the Philippine Army (PA) based in Camp Lapu-Lapu on 5 February 2009. There, he was held incommunicado for days and subjected to various forms of torture. He was transferred to a regular facility only after vigorous protests by him, his family, supporters and lawyers. His transfer to military custody is a retaliatory measure to silence him while under detention.
In protest of his surreptitious transfer, Patriarca has gone on hunger strike. He is reported to be guarded by a 12 man SWAT team in the incommunicado facility.
Patriarca is the second victim of harassment of NDFP-JASIG protected persons by the Government of the Philippines (GPH). Alan Jazmines, another NDFP Consultant and member of the NDFP Reciprocal Working Committee on Social and Economic Reforms (RWC-SER), has repeatedly been threatened with forcible transfer from Camp Crame to Camp Bagong Diwa.
The NDFP stands firmly on its demand for the expeditious release of most, if not all, of the 17 JASIG-protected persons, including Patriarca and Jazmines. It strongly condemns the GPH efforts to subject said JASIG-protected persons to harassment for its vindictive ends. #

On Taxation and Peace Negotiations

Interview with Prof. Jose Maria Sison, NDFP Chief Political Consultant

By Lira Dalangin Fernandez
Philippine Daily Inquirer
29 December  2010
Happy holidays, Professor Joma! Kumusta po kayo.
Hi Lira! Happy holidays and best wishes for the new year!
I am fine.
1. Several officials here say that the issue of revolutionary tax being imposed on firms, such as mining companies, should be among the agenda in the talks. what’s your take on this?
Answer: There is yet no peace agreement. The two conflicting sides of the civil war in the Philippines are still negotiating. Everyone must recognize the fact that there are two governments in the Philippines. One is the reactionary government of the big compradors and landlords seated in Manila and headed by Noynoy Aquino. The other is the revolutionary government of workers and peasants based in the countryside and led by the Communist Party of the Philippines.
The revolutionary government has always made it clear that it collects taxes in order to cover the costs of administration, defense, land reform, promotion of production and social programs, including public education, health, cultural and other activities.
The GRP civilian and military officials are wrong and are engaged in disinformation when they say that the revolutionary forces are collecting taxes from foreign mining companies. My understanding of the policy of the revolutionary government is banning, disabling and dismantling such mining companies because they damage the economy and environment and take away land from land reform. Please read the latest policy statements of the CPP in www.philippinerevolution.net These are the 42nd anniversary statement of the CPP on December 26 and the reiteration of policy regarding mining on December 29.
May I add that the foreign mining companies take away nonrenewable mineral resources and damage permanently the people’s aspiration for national industrialization. The CPP and other major patriotic organizations as well as the main religious organizations are opposed to the treasonous plunder of mineral resources by 100 per cent foreign-owned mining companies.
2. While not a precondition, do you agree that this should stop as confidence-building measure for the talks?
Answer: It is the duty and prerogative of the people’s revolutionary government to collect taxes for the purposes beneficial to the people. In contrast, the reactionary government collects taxes and engages in excessive foreign and domestic borrowing to serve the purposes of the foreign monopolies, the big compradors, landlords and the corrupt officials.
My understanding of the policy pronouncements of the CPP as leading party in the people’s revolutionary government is that it will not collect taxes from the foreign mining companies but will ban, disable and dismantle such companies. That should raise the confidence of the people in their revolutionary government and expose the treasonous character of the reactionary govenment.
3. What are the other possible agenda in both the January and February meetings?
Answer: The preliminary meeting in Oslo in January 14 to 18 will resolve certain issues and thus pave the way for the resumption of formal talks in February 15 to 21. The most important issues in the preliminary meeting pertain to compliance with the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees, the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law and certain confidence-building and goodwill measures.
The agenda in the resumption of formal talks will include exchange of credentials between the two panels, the reaffirmation of the existing agreements, compliance with JASIG, implmentation of CARHRIHL, accelerated negotiations on social and economic reforms by the Reciprocal Working Committees, the concept of working group on political and constitutional reforms and confidence-building and goodwill measures.###

The NDFP’s Stand on Peace Talks with Aquino Regime

by Luis G. Jalandoni
Chairperson, NDFP Negotiating Panel
11 – 12 November 2010

Dear Friends in the Philippine Ecumenical Peace Platform,

On behalf of the NDFP Negotiating Panel, I warmly greet and thank you for your invitation to join in this workshop of PEPP Luzon-NCR.
Let me first present some basic points about our standpoint on the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations.
The NDFP takes a long-term view of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations. We consider its fundamental aspects and look forward to what can be achieved.
Both the GRP and the NDFP have forged in The Hague Joint Declaration of 1992 the basic framework for a well-founded and sustained process of peace negotiations. This was further strengthened in subsequent agreements such as the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) of February 1995, the Joint Agreement on the Formation, Sequence and Operationalization of the Reciprocal Working Committees (RWC Agreement) of June 1995 and its Supplemental Agreement of March 1997, and the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) of March 1998.
These were followed by the Oslo Joint Statement of February 2004 and the Oslo Joint Statement II of April 2004 which led to the setting up in accordance with the CARHRIHL of the Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC) and its Joint Secretariat (JS) with an office in Quezon City which operates with the support of the Royal Norwegian Government.
Principle of Mutual Respect and Reciprocity in The Hague Joint Declaration
The NDFP stresses the vital importance of The Hague Joint Declaration because it contains the crucially essential principle of mutual respect and reciprocity in the wise provision agreed upon by both Parties, that is, the principle of non-capitulation. This means that both Parties agree not to impose or demand capitulation, but rather to seek a just negotiated solution by addressing the roots of the armed conflict through fundamental social, economic, political and constitutional reforms while respecting human rights and international humanitarian law in the course of the armed conflict.
The wisdom of this principle enshrined in The Hague Joint Declaration is clear when we look at the experiences of other peace negotiations. Wherever the roots of the armed conflict are not addressed and resolved and one party wants to impose capitulation or merely maneuvers to either destroy militarily or split the revolutionary movement, no just and lasting peace is achieved.
The Hague Joint Declaration basically defined the agenda for the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, namely, human rights and international humanitarian law, social and economic reforms, political and constitutional reforms, and end of hostilities and disposition of forces, as well as the modalities for conducting the peace negotiations.  The RWC Agreement of 1995 and its Supplemental Agreement of 1997 spelled out the concrete details on how to tackle these agenda items in proper sequence.
The JASIG and the CARHRIHL
The Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) of 1995 provides for the protection of all personnel of both Parties who participate in the peace negotiations. They are guaranteed safe passage and immunity from punitive actions such as arrest, detention and surveillance. The JASIG also stipulated that formal talks be held in a foreign neutral venue.
In the CARHRIHL, both Parties have agreed to bring into the framework of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian law conventions. Such instruments as the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Protocols additional thereto, the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights, the Convention Against Torture, and other UN Conventions are referred to in the CARHRIHL.
Lessons from Experience
It is important to learn concrete lessons from our experience. We must avoid the pitfalls and overcome the impediments that obstruct the attainment of a just and lasting peace.
All attempts to derail the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations from the correct path – whether through a demand for general and prolonged ceasefire before fundamental reforms are agreed upon and carried out, a false amnesty program, or a so-called Social Integration Program, and the DDR (Disarmament, Demobilization, Reintegration) framework aiming for the capitulation of the revolutionary movement, and so-called localized peace talks – have been firmly opposed by the NDFP as a violation of the principles enshrined in The Hague Joint Declaration.
We must point out that the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP), especially under the Arroyo administration, has put up serious and numerous obstacles to the implementation of CARHRIHL through more than a thousand extrajudicial killings of civilians, some two hundred enforced disappearances, numerous frustrated killings, torture, indiscriminate aerial and artillery bombings of communities, and uprooting of millions of civilians in Mindanao and other areas in the country, etc. The illegal arrest last February 6 of 43 health workers, the Morong 43, their torture and continued illegal detention, is a blatant example.
These violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by the GRP have also affected NDFP consultants, panel members and staff. Those covered by the protection of JASIG, which protects all personnel of both Parties involved in the peace negotiations, have been made targets for abduction and murder, arrest, torture, detention, surveillance, harassment and threats and other punitive actions by the GRP.
NDFP Reciprocal Working Committee on Socio-Economic Reforms member Sotero Llamas was killed by motorcycle-riding assassins in 2006.  Abducted and disappeared by state agents were NDFP consultants Prudencio Calubid and Rogelio Calubad in 2006 and Leo Velasco in 2007, among others.  NDFP Consultants and JASIG-protected persons arrested and still detained are Angie Ipong, Eduardo Sarmiento, Alfredo Mapano, Maria Luisa Pucray, Glicerio Pernia, Jovencio Balweg, Eduardo Serrano, and Jaime Soledad, among others.  Victims of trumped-up charges and threatened with warrants of arrest are NDFP Consultant Vicente Ladlad, NDFP RWC for Socio-Economic Reforms Members Rafael Baylosis and Randall Echanis. Moreover, the functioning of the Joint Monitoring Committee and its Joint Secretariat has been hampered by the refusal of the GRP to allow the JMC to meet, as well as its continuing submission of false and nuisance complaints against the NDFP.
Firm Foundation for Moving Forward
Despite the various declarations of suspensions, collapse and even termination by the GRP through the years, the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations have resulted in 12 bilateral peace agreements, which constitute a high standard and a good basis for working towards attaining a just and lasting peace in our country.
Furthermore, the Royal Norwegian Government remains committed to act as Third Party Facilitator. There is also the Joint Secretariat (JS) of the JMC holding office in Metro Manila. The GRP-NDFP peace negotiations have twice received the endorsement of the European Parliament. And we have your support and that of the Ecumenical Bishops Forum (EBF), the Norwegian Ecumenical Peace Platform, the Pilgrims for Peace, the Philippine Peace Center and other peace advocates in our country and abroad to continue with the peace negotiations.
We believe it is important to recognize the firm foundation that has been forged in the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, learn the positive and negative lessons, and move forward. We were hoping that after the May elections the new GRP administration would share this view.
Prospects for Peace Talks with the Benigno Aquino III Administration
However, we have to be realistic and take note of the present prospects for resuming the formal peace talks with the Benigno Aquino III administration.
Aquino’s Ceasefire Precondition
While the NDFP has declared its readiness to resume formal peace talks with the Aquino administration, we are deeply disappointed with the pronouncements of the new GRP regime regarding peace talks. President Aquino’s demand for a “malawakang tigil-putukan” before holding peace talks is a precondition that violates The Hague Joint Declaration. It is reminiscent of the stand of his late mother, former President Corazon Aquino, who demanded a ceasefire agreement before negotiations on social, economic and political reforms would be held. After the Mendiola massacre of peasants marching to demand land reform in January 1987 and the collapse of the peace talks, Corazon Aquino “unsheathed the sword of war.”
US Counter-Insurgency Guide
We also take note of the 22 April 2010 speech of Benigno Aquino III on peace and security, just eighteen days before the elections. The four main points he stated are completely in line with the US Government Counter-Insurgency Guide of 2009. The four main points, also called “pillars” by Secretary Teresita Deles, the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, do not speak of basic reforms in Philippine society but only of destroying the revolutionary movement by making the reactionary GRP credible in governance, providing basic services, pursuing economic development through foreign borrowings and neoliberal globalization, and strengthening the military capability of the state security forces.
Only last week, Aquino has directed his defense and security advisers to draft a national security plan based on these four points.
Aquino’s declaration in his State of the Nation Address (SONA) to increase the budget of the military because the population has doubled since the Marcos dictatorship also confirms his adherence to the US Counter-Insurgency Guide. The budget for the military has been increased by 81 %. This is scandalous when we consider the drastic cuts in the budgets for migrant workers, education, health and other basic services. This budget shows disrespect for the people while it follows the US Counter-Insurgency Guide. The US grant of $434 million is in line with the anti-people US-Aquino counter-insurgency plan.
Perpetuating the Culture of Impunity
Aquino gave fulsome praise to the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) in his first address to the military.  Absolutely no mention was made of the extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances and other human rights violations which UN Special Rapporteur Philip Alston and international and national organizations have condemned and imputed to the AFP. The declaration extending Oplan Bantay Laya (OBL) until January 2011 practically upheld the AFP’s counter-insurgency plan which led to gross and systematic violations of human rights during the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (GMA) regime.
In his SONA, Aquino also made no mention of the extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. Thus the culture of impunity among the GRP military and police is allowed to continue and prevail.  Even in the impotent Truth Commission, the investigation of human rights violations by the GRP military, police and paramilitary forces has been excluded from its avowed field of concern.
Publicity Campaign to Fight Corruption
His stress on the corruption of the previous regime as the main and even the only cause of poverty covers up the reality of foreign and feudal exploitation and oppression and the need for fundamental social, economic and political reforms. His avowed crusade to eradicate corruption in government is exposed as nothing more than a publicity and campaign stunt because, after four months in office, not a single case of corruption has been filed against GMA and he has been silent on corruption in the AFP and PNP, which has led to rebellion and mutiny from within their own ranks. Aquino has clearly signalled the generals that they can steal as much as they want in exchange for their loyalty to his regime.
Allowing the Military to Derail the Prospects for Resuming the Peace Talks
Aquino has emphasized to his military subalterns the priority of pursuing the AFP’s so-called counterinsurgency program. Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin has declared that the New People’s Army (NPA) must first surrender before peace talks can start. Evidently, he is ignorant of The Hague Joint Declaration. Furthermore, AFP Chief of Staff General Ricardo David has announced that they would defeat the revolutionary movement in three years, reiterating the failed plan of GMA to destroy the revolutionary movement or render it inconsequential by June 2010.  Then, on September 9, the AFP announced a five-year battle plan against the New People’s Army.
Trumped-Up Charge against NDFP Panel Members and Consultants
The Aquino government filed on 21 July 2010 in Hilongos, Leyte, the trumped-up charge of murder against Prof. Jose Maria Sison, NDFP Chief Political Consultant, myself, NDFP Panel Member Julieta de Lima, NDFP Consultant Vicente Ladlad, NDFP Reciprocal Working Committee on Social and Economic Reforms members, Rafael Baylosis and Randall Echanis and 48 others. This again is a gross violation of the JASIG.
The filing of false charges is by itself a violation of human rights and of the CARHRIHL.  It is aimed at persecuting those falsely accused and setting them up for violent acts by the reactionary state.
We consider it necessary for all those who strive for a just and lasting peace, for all peace advocates who desire a resumption of formal peace talks, to take into account these serious negative indications of the position and attitude of the Aquino government regarding peace negotiations.
NDFP Concrete Proposals
Mr. Aquino also appears to be not adequately informed about the concrete proposals that the NDFP has made. In his SONA address, he taunted the NDFP for not having any concrete proposals, even as he issued the precondition of a general ceasefire.
He makes no reference at all to the repeated demands of the NDFP for accelerating the peace negotiations and the NDFP Proposal for Immediate Just Peace issued and hand-delivered to the GRP Negotiating Panel and the Norwegian facilitator in August 2005 in Oslo. The NDFP has given the GRP since 1998 the NDFP Draft for the Comprehensive Agreement on Social and Economic Reforms (CASER) containing concrete analyses and proposals on land reform, national industrialization, foreign trade, financial and monetary system, national patrimony, rights of the working people, etc.
Extreme Slowness in Resuming the Formal Talks in the GRP-NDFP Peace Negotiations
The Benigno Aquino regime has shown extreme slowness in moving for the resumption of the formal talks in the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations. It took nearly four months after its inauguration before the GRP could form its negotiating panel with the NDFP. It has publicly announced that it intends to give priority to the negotiations with the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) but, even here, there has been not much movement and some disturbing developments like the arrest of an MILF leader imbued with safety and immunity guarantees and the deliberate attempt by the military to link the MILF to the Cotabato bus bombing.
The GRP has also shown a certain measure of unreasonableness and hostility to the NDFP by failing so far to release as goodwill measure the 388 political prisoners, while ordering the release of 400 military prisoners.  Mr. Aquino is really much unlike his mother and President Ramos who ordered the release of all if not most of the political prisoners in 1986 and 1992, respectively, upon their assumption into office.
The GRP also takes a negative attitude towards my proposed courtesy call on Aquino, following precedents with the Ramos, Estrada and GMA regimes, in the course of a visit to the Philippines for a one-on-one meeting with Atty. Alex Padilla, the newly appointed Chairperson of the GRP Negotiating Panel, in order to discuss the resumption of the formal talks.
One hopeful note is the appointment to the GRP panel of personalities who appreciate the Filipino people’s struggle for national independence and democracy. The appointment of these personalities encourages the belief that there will be serious negotiations towards mutually satisfactory agreements.
PEPP Letter of 16 October 2010 to President Benigno Aquino III
We thank you for your excellent 16 October 2010 letter to President Benigno Aquino III, urging both the GRP and the NDFP to immediately resume the formal talks in the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations in accordance with previously signed agreements, implement the CARHRIHL, negotiate an agreement on social and economic reforms, carry out confidence building measures to create a goodwill atmosphere, and bring an end the culture of impunity.  We earnestly hope that President Aquino would heed your letter.
We thank you most of all for adopting in your letter the concrete measures that we had proposed earlier like the release of all political prisoners, especially the Morong 43, Angelina Ipong and Maria Luisa Pucray, and the need to address the increasing US military intervention in the country.
NDFP Ready for Serious Peace Talks and Determined to Carry on Revolutionary Struggle
Despite the negative indications and attitude of the Aquino administration, the NDFP is prepared to resume peace talks based on The Hague Joint Declaration and other agreements.  We remain committed to enter into serious peace talks aimed at addressing the root causes of the armed conflict through fundamental social, economic, political and constitutional reforms.  Under the current conditions of severe and worsening economic crisis and intensified suffering of the people, negotiations and agreements on social and economic reforms, such as land reform and national industrialization, are urgently necessary, together with implementation of the CARHRIHL.
The NDFP also makes it very clear that should the Aquino regime refuse to address the roots of the armed conflict in the peace negotiations, if it insists on following the US counter-insurgency plan in an attempt to defeat the revolutionary movement, the revolutionary forces are determined to carry on their struggle for national and social liberation to achieve a just and lasting peace.  We are convinced that this is for the benefit of the workers, peasants, women and youth, urban poor and indigenous people, all sectors of the oppressed, exploited and struggling Filipino people.  We call for your solidarity and support in the pursuit of this liberation struggle to achieve a just and lasting peace in our country. ###

The NDFP’s Stand on Peace Talks with Aquino Regime

by Luis G. Jalandoni
Chairperson, NDFP Negotiating Panel
25 September 2010
Dear Friends in the Philippine Ecumenical Peace Platform – Cotabato,
We in the NDFP Negotiating Panel warmly greet you.  We thank you for your invitation to join you in this PEPP Peace Forum, which you are sponsoring together with the SUARA Bangsamoro. We likewise warmly greet the SUARA Bangsamoro.
May we present some basic points about our standpoint on the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations.
We take a long-term view of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, consider its fundamental aspects and then look forward to what can be achieved.
Both the GRP and the NDFP have forged the basic framework for a well-founded and sustained process of peace negotiations in The Hague Joint Declaration of 1992. This was reaffirmed and further strengthened in subsequent agreements such as the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) of February 1995, the Joint Agreement on the Formation, Sequence and Operationalization of the Reciprocal Working Committees (RWCs) of June 1995, the Supplemental Agreement thereto of March 1997, and the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) of March 1998.
These were followed by the Oslo Joint Statement of February 2004 and the Oslo Joint Statement II of April 2004 which led to the setting up the Joint Monitoring Committee (JMC) and the Joint Secretariat (JS) with an office in Quezon City with the financial and moral support of the Royal Norwegian Government.
Principle of Mutual Respect and Reciprocity in The Hague Joint Declaration
We stress the vital importance of The Hague Joint Declaration because it contains the crucially essential principle of mutual respect and reciprocity in the wise provision agreed upon by both Parties, that is, the principle of non-capitulation.  This means that both Parties solemnly agree not to impose or demand capitulation, but rather to seek a just negotiated solution by addressing the roots of the armed conflict through fundamental social, economic, political and constitutional reforms while respecting human rights and international humanitarian law all throughout the process. We have appreciated the PEPP’s repeated declaration that the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations must address the roots of the armed conflict.
The wisdom of this principle enshrined in The Hague Joint Declaration is clear when we look at the experiences of other peace negotiations.  Wherever the roots of the armed conflict are not addressed and resolved and one party wants to impose capitulation or merely maneuvers to either destroy militarily or split the resistance movement, no just and lasting peace is achieved.
The Hague Joint Declaration basically defined the agenda for the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, namely, human rights and international humanitarian law, social and economic reforms, political and constitutional reforms, and end of hostilities and disposition of forces. The RWC agreements of 1995 and 1997 spelled out the concrete details on how to tackle these agenda items in proper sequence.
The JASIG and the CARHRIHL
The Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) of 1995 provides for the protection of all personnel of both Parties who participate in the peace negotiations.  They are guaranteed safe passage and immunity from punitive actions such as arrest, detention and surveillance.  The JASIG also stipulated that formal talks be held in a foreign neutral venue.
In the CARHRIHL, both Parties have achieved the bringing in of internationally recognized human rights and international humanitarian law conventions as a valuable and integral part of the framework of the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations.  Such instruments as the Geneva Conventions and Protocols additional thereto, the Convention against Torture and other UN Conventions are integrated in the CARHRIHL.
Lessons from Experience
It is important to learn concrete lessons from our experience.  We must avoid the pitfalls and overcome the impediments that obstruct the attainment of a just and lasting peace.
All attempts to derail the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations from the correct path — whether through a demand for general and prolonged ceasefire before fundamental reforms are agreed upon and carried out, a false amnesty program, or a so-called Social Integration Program, and the DDR (Disarmament, Demobilization, Reintegration) framework aiming for the capitulation of the  revolutionary movement, and so-called localized peace talks — have been firmly opposed by the NDFP as a violation of the principles enshrined in The Hague Joint Declaration.
We have to state that the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GRP), especially under the Arroyo administration, has put up serious and numerous obstacles to the implementation of CARHRIHL through more than a thousand extrajudicial killings of civilians, some two hundred enforced disappearances, numerous frustrated killings, torture, and uprooting of millions of civilians in Mindanao and other areas in the country, etc.  The illegal arrest last February 6, the torture and continued illegal detention of 43 health workers, the Morong 43, is a blatant example.
These violations of human rights and international humanitarian law by the GRP have also affected NDFP consultants, panel members and staff.  Those covered by the protection of JASIG, which protects all personnel from both Parties involved in the peace negotiations, have been made targets for abduction and murder, arrest, torture, detention, surveillance, harassment and threats and other punitive actions by the GRP.
NDFP Reciprocal Working Committee on Socio-Economic Reforms member Sotero Llamas was killed by motorcycle-riding assassins in 2006.  Abducted and disappeared by state agents were NDFP consultants Prudencio Calubid, and Rogelio Calubad in 2006 and Leo Velasco in 2007, among others.  NDFP Consultants and JASIG-protected persons arrested and still detained are Angie Ipong, Glicerio Pernia, Eduardo Sarmiento, Alfredo Mapano, Jovencio Balweg, Eduardo Serrano, Jaime Soledad, and Maria Luisa Pucray, among others.  Victims of trumped-up charges and threatened with warrants of arrest are NDFP Consultant Vicente Ladlad,     NDFP RWC for Socio-Economic Reforms Members Rafael Baylosis and Randall Echanis.  Moreover, the functioning of the Joint Secretariat of the Joint Monitoring Committee has been hampered by the submission of more than a thousand false nuisance complaints against the NDFP.
Firm Foundation for Moving Forward
Despite the various illegitimate suspensions, declaration of collapse, and even termination, made by the GRP through the years, the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations have resulted in 12 bilateral peace agreements, which constitute a high standard and a good basis for working towards attaining a just and lasting peace in our country.
Furthermore, we have the consistent and firm support of the Royal Norwegian Government as Third Party Facilitator.  We have the Joint Secretariat holding office in Metro Manila.  We have twice received the endorsement of the European Parliament.  And we have your support and that of the Ecumenical Bishops Forum (EBF), the Norwegian Ecumenical Peace Platform, the Philippine Peace Center and other peace advocates in our country and abroad.
We believe it is important to recognize the firm foundation that has been forged in the GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, learn the positive and negative lessons, and move forward.  We were hoping after the May elections that the new GRP administration would share this view.
Prospects for Peace Talks with the Benigno Aquino III Administration
However, we have to be realistic and take note of the present prospects for peace talks with the Benigno Aquino III administration.
Aquino’s Ceasefire Precondition
While the NDFP has declared its readiness to resume formal peace talks with the Aquino administration, we are deeply disappointed with the pronouncements of the new government regarding peace talks.  President Aquino’s demand for a “malawakang tigil-putukan” before holding peace talks is a precondition that violates The Hague Joint Declaration.  It is reminiscent of the stand of his late mother, former President Corazon Aquino which blocked the negotiations on social, economic and political reforms.  After the Mendiola massacre of peasants marching to demand land reform in January 1987 and the collapse of the peace talks, Corazon Aquino “unsheathed the sword of war”.
US Counter-Insurgency Guide
We also take note of the 22 April 2010 speech of Benigno Aquino III on peace and security, just eighteen days before the elections.  The four main points he stated are completely in line with the US Government Counter-Insurgency Guide of 2009.  The four main points, also called “pillars” by Secretary Teresita Deles, the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process, are directed at destroying the revolutionary movement.  The four points are aimed at making the reactionary government credible in governance, providing basic services and economic development, and strengthen the military capability of the state’s security forces.
Aquino’s declaration in his SONA address to increase the budget of the military because the population has doubled since the Marcos dictatorship confirms his adherence to the US Counter-Insurgency Guide.  The budget for the military has been increased by 81 %. This is scandalous when we consider the drastic cuts in the budgets for migrant workers and the great needs in education, health and other basic services. This budget shows disrespect for the people while it follows the US Counter-Insurgency Guide. The US grant of $434 million is in line with the anti-people US-Aquino counter-insurgency plan.
Aquino’s address to the Armed Forces of the Philippines praises the AFP.  Absolutely no mention is made of the extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances and other human rights violations which UN Special Rapporteur Philip Alston and international and national organizations have condemned and imputed to the AFP. The declaration extending until January 2011 the Oplan Bantay Laya, is another major negative decision. OBL is widely denounced as the root cause of numerous gross human rights violations.
In his SONA address, Aquino also made no mention of the extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances.  The culture of impunity among the military and police is left untouched.  Even the impotent Truth Commission excludes human rights violations from its avowed field of concern.
His stress on the corruption of the previous regime as the main and even the only cause of poverty covers up the reality of foreign and feudal exploitation and oppression and the need for fundamental social, economic and political reforms.  His avowed crusade to eradicate corruption in government is exposed as nothing more than a publicity and campaign stunt in light of his complete silence on corruption in the AFP and PNP, which have led to rebellion and mutiny from within their own ranks. Aquino has clearly signalled the generals that they can steal as much as they want and can in exchange for their loyalty to his regime.
Defense Secretary Gazmin’s and AFP Chief of Staff David’s Pronouncements
Aquino has emphasized to his military subalterns the priority of counterinsurgency so-called, and has not risen above their mean impulses.  Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin has declared that the New People’s Army must first surrender before peace talks can start. Evidently, he is ignorant of The Hague Joint Declaration.  Furthermore, AFP Chief of Staff General Ricardo David has announced that they would defeat the revolutionary movement in three years, reiterating the failed plan of Gloria Arroyo to destroy the revolutionary movement by June 2010 or render it inconsequential. On September 9, the AFP announced a five-year battle plan against the New People’s Army.
Trumped-Up Charge against NDFP Panel Members and Consultants
The latest negative move of the Aquino government is the filing of the trumped-up charge of murder on 21 July 2010 in Hilongos, Leyte against Prof. Jose Maria Sison, NDFP Chief Political Consultant, myself, NDFP Panel Member Julieta de Lima, NDFP Consultant Vicente Ladlad, NDFP Reciprocal Working Committee on Social and Economic Reforms members, Rafael Baylosis and Randall Echanis and 48 others.  This is a gross violation of the JASIG.
The use of false charges is by itself a violation of human rights and is aimed at persecuting those falsely accused and setting them up for further violent acts of the state against them.
We consider it necessary for all those who strive for a just and lasting peace, for all peace advocates who desire a resumption of formal peace talks, to take into account these serious negative indications of the position and attitude of the Aquino government regarding peace negotiations.
NDFP Concrete Proposals
Mr. Aquino also appears to be not adequately informed about the concrete proposals that the NDFP has made.  In his SONA address, he taunted the NDFP for not having any concrete proposals, even as he issued the precondition of a general ceasefire.
He either  totally ignores or he is totally ignorant of the repeated demands of the NDFP for accelerating the peace negotiations and the NDFP Proposal for Immediate Just Peace issued and hand-delivered to the GRP Negotiating Panel and the Norwegian facilitator in August 2005 in Oslo. The NDFP has given the GRP the NDFP Draft for the Comprehensive Agreement on Social and Economic Reforms (CASER) since 1998 containing concrete analyses and proposals on land reform, national industrialization, foreign trade, financial and monetary system, national patrimony, rights of the working people, etc.
Moreover, the NDFP has declared that it is willing to receive an emissary or a team of emissaries from the Aquino administration to discuss the steps needed for the resumption of formal talks.  Such emissaries were sent by former Presidents Corazon Aquino, Fidel Ramos and Gloria Arroyo.
Appeal to Peace Advocates
To you and other peace advocates, we reiterate our appreciation for your consistent support for peace negotiations and we appeal for your effective action to push for GRP-NDFP peace negotiations that address the roots of the armed conflict through fundamental social, economic and political reforms.
We wish here to acknowledge your call to the GRP and NDFP “to immediately undertake measures to reactivate and revitalize the stalled negotiations and resume the formal peace talks without preconditions in accordance with all prior bilateral agreements.” We also acknowledge the excellent Statement of Unity issued by the Ecumenical Bishops’ Forum on August 20. It calls on both the GRP and the NDFP to make the peace process their top priority. It calls for adherence to The Hague Joint Declaration and other peace agreements and to move on to negotiations on social and economic reforms. It moreover calls for emissaries of both parties to meet and also for the immediate constitution of the negotiating panels, among others.
We wish to suggest to you some further concrete actions.
Pressure the Aquino administration, through the Secretary of Justice Leila de Lima and others, to release the illegally detained Morong 43. You could visit Carina “Judilyn” Oliveros, the nursing mother and her new-born child at the Philippine General Hospital, or 27 year-old Mercy Castro who will give birth next month, or the granddaughter of Crispin “Ka Bel” Beltran, Jane Balleta,  to gain personal knowledge of their situation and push through your contacts for the release of the Morong 43. Secretary de Lima had declared that they should be released.
You could visit Angie Ipong, Glicerio Pernia, Eduardo Serrano or other detained NDFP Consultants and JASIG protected persons and press for their release. Concrete details about their case and place of detention, health condition, etc. can be secured from the NDFP-Nominated Section of the Joint Secretariat (JS) which holds office at the 6th Floor, Immaculate Conception Multi-Purpose Center, 41 Lantana Street, Cubao, Q.C.
You could in cooperation with SUARA Bangsamoro intensify the campaign against the increasing US military intervention in Mindanao and other parts of the country, denounce this as a blatant violation of national sovereignty, a basic guiding principle of the peace negotiations.
You could also campaign against the intensified militarization by the GRP military in the communities which causes massive evacuation of civilians especially in Mindanao.
These are just a few concrete suggestions. You may think and decide on other concrete actions.
NDFP Ready for Serious Peace Talks and Determined to Carry on Revolutionary Struggle
Despite all the negative indications of the stand of the Aquino administration regarding peace talks, the NDFP stands ready to resume peace talks based on The Hague Joint Declaration and other agreements.  We are willing to go into serious peace talks aimed at addressing the root causes of the armed conflict through fundamental social, economic, political and constitutional reforms. Under the current conditions of severe and worsening economic crisis and intensified suffering of the people, negotiations and agreements on social and economic reforms, such as land reform and national industrialization, are urgently necessary, together with implementation of the CARHRIHL.
The NDFP also makes it very clear that should the Aquino regime refuse or ignore the calls for peace talks to address the roots of the armed conflict, if it follows the US counter-insurgency plan and only wants ceasefire and surrender or aims for a militarist solution,
the revolutionary forces are determined to carry on their struggle for national and social liberation to achieve a just and lasting peace. We are convinced that this is for the benefit of the workers, peasants, women and youth, urban poor and indigenous people, all sectors of the oppressed, exploited and struggling Filipino people. For such a liberation struggle for the benefit of the people and ultimately for a just and lasting peace, the NDFP likewise calls for your solidarity and support. ###

Two Proposals for a Just and Lasting Peace

PRESS STATEMENT
27 July 2010

**Two proposals for a just and lasting peace**

By Prof. JOSE MARIA SISON
Chief Political Consultant
NDFP Negotiating Panel

The Negotiating Panel of the National Democratic Front of the
Philippines (NDFP) has repeatedly declared its readiness to resume
peace negotiations with the Government of the Republic of the
Philippines (GRP) under the Aquino II administration. It has also
signalled its willingness to receive in The Netherlands or Norway a
senior emissary or a team of emissaries of said administration to
discuss the possible course and perspective of the GRP-NDFP peace
negotiations.

On my part, as Chief Political Consultant of the NDFP Negotiating
Panel, I have long proposed the resumption and acceleration of the
GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, especially with regard to social and
economic reforms, in accordance with The Hague Joint Declaration and
subsequent major agreements.

I have also gone so far as to propose a concept of immediate truce
and alliance on the basis of a mutually acceptable declaration of
principles and policies upholding national independence and democracy,
confronting the basic problems of the Filipino people and adopting
effective measures of social, economic and political reforms. It is
unjust for anyone to expect that the revolutionary forces and the
people to simply cease fire and surrender to a rotten ruling system
that shuns patriotic and progressive demands and refuses to engage in
basic reforms.

I hope that the Aquino II administration can consider seriously the
two proposals for the benefit of the people. Like the NDFP, I welcome
any serious step of said administration towards the attainment of a
just peace and national unity by addressing the roots of the armed
conflict and arriving with the revolutionary forces and the people at
agreements on basic social, economic and political reforms.

I urge the Aquino II administration to override such
counterrevolutionary notions as those previously spelled out by its
officials that the military can get anything it wants despite the
severe economic crisis and bankruptcy of the reactionary government,
that the revolutionary forces and people surrender and that they can
be destroyed and pacified in the next three years.

I challenge the Aquino II administration to reject the US
Counterinsurgency Guide and take the path of seeking a concord of just
peace and national unity with the NDFP by addressing the roots of the
armed conflict and forging agreements on social, economic and
political reforms. It is malicious and unjust to construe the people’s
resistance to injustice, oppression and exploitation as the problem
rather than as the consequence of foreign and feudal domination.

Such monstrous problems as foreign monopoly capitalism, domestic
feudalism and bureaucratic corruption are the longrunning and current
causes of underdevelopment, unemployment, poverty and misery. All
well-meaning forces and people must unite and work together to
confront and solve these problems and work for a new and better
Philippines that is truly free and democratic, socially just,
progressive and peaceful.