Statements of Political Detainees Benito Tiamzon and Wilma Austria

Statement regarding the visit of the Commission on Human Rights
We thank Chairperson Etta Rosales and two other Commissioners of the CHR (Commission on Human Rights) for the visit on 25 March to find out if our human rights were respected during our arrest.
We emphasized to the CHR commissioners that the most important and serious issues relative to our human rights are our being framed-up, accused of fabricated charge of illegal possession of firearms and explosives and the planting of evidence to justify our illegal arrest and detention and that of our five companions in the house.
This gross violation of human rights completely negates all the efforts of CHR to initiate in the PNP and AFP the respect for human rights.  The few and trickled measures to effect in the PNP and AFP the respect for human rights are rendered inutile if the more fundamental right against illegal arrest is wantonly practiced by the whole institution and the State. This creates intense cynicism not only among the victims but also in the ranks of the police and soldiers.
The true and serious promotion of the respect for human rights is towards the welfare and aspirations of the people.  In view of this, we urge the CHR to launch an earnest campaign against the contempt for human rights of the PNP, AFP and the ruling State. ###
Reply to Mr. Alex Padilla, and with regards to the violation of the JASIG (Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees)
Released on March 24, 2014
We reiterate our condemnation of our arrest as an outright violation of the Joint Agreement on Safety and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) that gives us immunity as national consultants of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines with NDFID No. 978226 (Wilma Austria) and NDFID No. 978227 (Benito with the name Crising Banaag).
The claim of the head of the GPH peace panel, Alex Padilla, that we are not covered by the JASIG is a warped lie.  Wilma was openly confirmed as NDFP national consultant by former GRP peace panel head Ambassador Howard Dee, as well as by Pres. Ramos when he ordered the release of Wilma Austria in 1994 as a confidence and goodwill building measure.  Meanwhile, Benito was among the original recipients of the NDFP Document of Identification and JASIG immunity, a thing that was expected and indubitable.  Whatever pretexts the GPH panel will come up with, its claim that Benito has no role in the peace process and is not covered by the JASIG is utterly farcical.
NDF consultants, like us, can significantly contribute to the peace process because of our crucial role in the struggle.  Our role in the struggle is a requisite to our role in the peace process. The involvement of the movement is inherent in a peace process; hence, the position of a few that the struggle must cease first before we participate in the peace process is unreasonable and will not help.  We believe that for the realization of a true, lasting and just peace, the pursuit of the struggle with all our might is not contrary but rather in unity with and corresponds to the peace process. ###
With regards to the allegation of the AFP that Benito Tiamzon and Wilma Austria are the brains behind the “anti-infiltration hysteria”                
Released on March 24, 2014
The allegation made by the PNP officer (after our statement was read) that the brains behind the anti-infiltration hysteria “kahos” were Benito and Wilma Tiamzon is a stark lie and fabrication.  This is contrary to the truth.
The “kahos” was a local campaign which was planned and started in some parts of Mindanao in 1984, at the time that Benito and Wilma were in Luzon and had no direct responsibility of the movement in Mindanao.
When the belated report on the “kahos” was received, this was immediately stopped, investigated and the error, fully rectified.
Benito and Wilma played a crucial role in leading the investigation and rectification, as well as in formulating, approving and disseminating clear and stricter rules on the investigation, trial and judgment.
The movement has a clear and strict policies and rules on the respect for human rights and democratic rights of its members and the people.  These are systematically and continuously disseminated to all.
The CARHRIHL that was signed by the NDFP and GPH reflects the stand and policies of the Party and the movement on the respect for human rights and democratic rights and the humane conduct of the armed struggle.
On the other hand, the human rights abuses of the GPH and its armed forces all the more increased and intensified.  Extrajudicial killings, which Palparan grossly propagated, massacres such as the ruthless mass killing of the peasants in Palo, Leyte continue.  Militarization, especially in the rural areas, and all the turpitude and abuses linked to it, such as illegal arrest, torture, killing, and dislocation of whole barangays and communities are widespread. ###

ADVANCE OUR STRUGGLE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEACE!

ADVANCE OUR STRUGGLE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AND PEACE!

We, consultants of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) to the peace talks between the Government of the Republic of the Philippines (GPH)) and the NDFP join our fellow political prisoners, human rights defenders and advocates, friends and relatives of victims of human rights violations, and other personalities for the defense of human rights in expressing our militant support to the success of the International Conference for Human Rights and Peace in the Philippines which will be held on July 19-21 at the Great Eastern Hotel.

We extend our congratulations and thanks to the sponsors (International Coordinating Committee for Human Rights in the Philippines, KARAPATAN and the Ecumenical Voice for Human Rights) of this historical gathering that will uphold and defend the human rights of the Filipino people in particular and of mankind in general.

We salute our martyrs who have paid the supreme sacrifice with their lives in the defense of human rights.

We congratulate also the various human rights organizations and other advocates in launching this activity amidst the continuing impunity of the state agents in violating the basic human rights of the Filipino people and the brittle status of peace in this troubled land.

As political prisoners here in Camp Crame, we have witnessed so many human rights violations against political prisoners and other detainees here and other detention centers all over the archipelago. Women detainees are subjected to sexual molestations and other means of harassment in order for them to submit to the caprices of some jail officials.

Muslim detainees also experienced various unjust restrictions and discriminatory policies that are synonymous to penalties or punishments for so-called “terrorists” labeled by US and Philippine Authorities under their “war on terror” campaign. So many Muslim detainees are incarcerated due to mistaken identity fiasco of the government police and military operations. Many more detainees languished in jails and detention centers due to lack of financial resources and right connections that will assist them in defending themselves in courts or in facilitating their early release based on the absence of probable cause or insufficient evidences.

In our particular case as political prisoners, the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyer (NUPL) in its press statement last September 14, 2012 for the 5th year of its founding and on the occasion of the 40th year of Martial Law stated: “In concurrent jail visits across the country, NUPL highlighted the plight of political prisoners. In the conduct of its advocacy, NUPL has discovered that the alleged acts of prisoners are political in nature. Only a slim minority of political prisoners have been changed with rebellion. In most cases suspected political offenders are improperly charged with non-bailable ordinary crimes.” Furthermore, the same NUPL statement stressed that: “The NUPL has assessed that most of these (cases) are actually improper, false or fabricated charges that further persecute these detainees, degrade their stature, and mock the basic rules of evidence. This is a travesty of justice on top of the multifarious violations of their rights including torture and harassment.

On the other hand, the majority of the Filipino people especially those coming from the workers and peasants are suffering various human rights violations especially their socio-economic and cultural rights. They are being denied their right to health, housing and education. As expounded by Ex-Chief Justice Reynato Puno in his speech at the general assembly of the NUPL NCR last July 6, 2013, he said: “Filipinos must be able to demand from their government their right to housing, education and health or these socioeconomic rights would remain mere words on paper.” He further stressed: “We all know that a right that has no remedy is not a right at all.” He even cited the President Aquino’s veto of the Magna Carta of the Poor and the bill of the traditional view of socioeconomic rights not being demandable and because of a lack of funding to support the enforcement of these rights.

Against the backdrop of massive demolitions of urban poor communities especially in the metropolis to give way to the proposed Public-Private Partnership (PPP) projects of the government that will be established along esteros, ex-CJ Puno cited the experience of South Africa wherein a “South African housing activist who had sought relief before the high court and filed a case against the government after it failed to respond for applications for housing assistance and after it demolished the shacks that Irene Grootboom and her neighbors were occupying. In the end, “the Constitutional Court ruled that the issue raised was justifiable or could be entertained. Thus, “poor people could go to court and ask that their socio-economic rights in this case their right to housing be implemented by the appropriate government officials.

In our country, this will be a long shot target considering the political and economic bias of the justices of the Supreme Court and its lower courts. We can only rely on the militant actions and resistance of the people against these attacks on our democratic rights and freedoms. As stated by the CPP: “Oppression is a necessary concomitant of class exploitation. It is thus in the nature of the monopoly bourgeoisie to carry out attacks on the democratic rights and freedoms of the working class and the rest of the people In order to preserve the system of exploitation.”

We call on all human rights defenders and advocates to rise up the banner in upholding the human rights and raise the demand for “reforms to serve the immediate needs of the people for employment, decent income, better working and living conditions, and the availability of basic social services.”

We must collectively fight for the defense and advance of our human rights – civil, political, social, economic and cultural – for the benefit of the exploited and oppressed people. We must be able to act accordingly as the socio-economic crisis results in political crisis, and the forces and agents of monopoly capitalism malign and try to discredit democratic protest as unlawful rebellion or even as terrorism, and thus justify political repression. We must unite and fight for our human rights and strive to attain a just and lasting peace in our land!

Free all political prisoners!

Advance our struggle for human rights and peace!

(Signed)

Renante M. Gamara

(Signed)

Eduardo O. Sarmiento

(Signed)

Eduardo R. Serrano

Political Prisoners, Camp Crame, Quezon City

July 10, 2013

Even worse violations of justice, law and human rights in the case of hundreds of political prisoners

As the Court of Appeals said in the case of Joanne Urbina (who was detained at Camp Crame for five years since 2007– until just recently ordered by the court to be released for having been detained that long without actual charges against her — and who was backed up by the Gabriela Women’s Party in her courageous, well-documented and successful resistance and complaint against attempts at sexual molestation by a high ranking Camp Crame police intelligence director): “More than five years of detention without a valid information filed in court, is unreasonable; it is intolerable; it is shockingly unimaginable… and what she had gone through smacks of persecution rather than prosecution… It conjures up images of Guantanamo Bay detainees who have never been allowed a speedy trial, a civil right…”

The injustice she went through for half a decade is not in any way a rare and isolated case in the country. In fact, thousands have gone through, and thousands continue to go through the same – and even worse.

Throughout the country, political prisoners most particularly have been going through even worse persecution in the hands of their arrestors, in jails and in courts. This, despite the Aquino regime’s barefaced denial of the fact that there are political prisoners – – actually, a great many of them – – in the country.

As the country’s leading human rights organization, KARAPATAN, has meticulously been identifying, monitoring, documenting and strongly protesting, there are at present more than 400 political prisoners in the country, more than half of them arrested and detained since the onset of the current regime and the rest assumed from the previous regime.

Most of these more than 400 political prisoners at present have been going through and suffering cold-hearted persecution, injustice and human rights violations, even worse than what Urbina had gone through. Practically all of these political prisoners comprise victims of unjust, arbitrary and illegal arrest, detention and swamping with numerous intentionally made-unbailable, trumped-up charges, following the ruling state’s long-standing institutionalized policy of suppressing and criminalizing political dissent and the advocacy and struggle for substantive and fundamental political and socio-economic-cultural reforms; and the arresting commands’ widespread practice of victimizing even ordinary community folk, just to be able to claim victories in “anti-terrorist” operations and “all-out wars” and collect huge bounties for the arrest of these victims.

Practically all of these victims have been arrested without warrants of arrest, and the supposed warrants were supplied to the jail authorities and the courts only after the arrests.

Most of these victims were arrested, detained and charged not as their real selves, but – – intentionally – – as different persons, and in many cases even just as aliases of different persons. There have also been several cases, where different victims arrested in different circumstances and In different places, have been detained at the same time or at different times in the same jails or in different jails, and charged in the same courts or in different courts. There have also been a number that may look funny but are actually deeply angering cases, where pairs of intentional “mistaken identity” victims detained together in the same jail are brought to court handcuffed to each other and made to stand together, whenever their supposed names are called out in court.

These victims of intentional “mistaken identities” have been arrested, detained and charged in court, just in order for their arrestors to be able to make big money from “wanted” lists of supposed “terrorists” with huge U.S.-funded bounties for the arrest and “neutralization.” None of those who have been collecting such huge bounties have been made to account, much less be penalized, for making intentional “mistaken identity” claims, as the collection of bounties for the arrest and “neutralization” of supposed “terrorists” are made confidentially.

There have also been a number of foreign (Indonesian) political prisoners forcibly and surreptitiously smuggled from imprisonment abroad (in Malaysia) and transferred to Philippine imprisonment through the Philippine National Police Intelligence Group PNP IG) under the tight direction and supervision of the U.S. FBI. The PNP IG provided fake Filipino identities for these U.S. rendition victims. As the victims were resisting, they were beaten up, injected with drugs to render them unconscious, straightjacketted, blindfolded, gagged, loaded into a private plane, flown into the country and brought straight to detention under PNP custody in Camp Crame, where they were hidden from the public for more than a year, and only after then (after a number of other detainees have seen them) were they surfaced and allowed to get in touch with their families through the Indonesian embassy. All the time, they kept on being subjected to pressure and interrogation by U.S. FBI and PNP IG operatives together in torture cells of the PNP IG headquarters in Camp Crame, and by U.S. FBI operatives alone in a secret U.S. FBI room right beside their cells in their detention area in Camp Crame.

It was only four years later when they were brought to court and swamped with trumped-up charges supposedly as Filipino terrorists (i.e., as Abu Sayyaf bandits) – who they never were.

In the case filed against one of them (Ahmad Saifullah Ibrohim), the case had actually already long been decided by another court, and the original one accused (Ibrahim Ali) in the same case had already been convicted for life and is now serving sentence in a regular penitentiary for convicted criminals. And yet the same case is again undergoing trial, where the accused is another person from another country and is absolutely innocent of the charges.

In the meantime, these U.S. rendition victims have been detained in the Philippines under intentional “mistaken identities” for eight years now. For up to seven of those eight years, they were detained at the PNP Custodial Center in Camp Crame. One was transferred earlier (in 2010) to the Special Intensive Care Area (SICA) jail for “high risk” prisoners, at Camp Bagong Diwa. The others were also transferred to the SICA jail one-by-one, after their ala-Guantanamo detention, the U.S. FBI intrusion into their cases and that of other political prisoners and the existence of a secret U.S. FBI room right in their detention area in Camp Crame were documented and exposed in the mass media last year.

Malacanang at once had to lie and deny all these, and order the immediate clean-up of the exposed ala-Guantanamo detention area in Camp Crame, and the getting rid particularly of the one responsible for the exposé. A political prisoner and National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDF) peace consultant, who had been detained together with these U.S. rendition victims for more than a year and was then able to document and expose the injustice, falsifications and other anomalies and human rights violations against these U.S. rendition victims and other political prisoners in Camp Crame, was – – on order of Malacanang – – transferred surreptitiously and in a rush within a week after the mass media exposé.

Many other political prisoners have been arrested and detained as minors, or as elderly/sickly – – without any humanitarian concern in regard to their ages and medical conditions.

Many of the elderlies/sickly have suffered severe ailments and further deterioration of their health, because of the poor, cramped conditions; poor food rations; lack of medical attention; and the indifferent treatment and severe restrictions they have been undergoing in jail. A number of these have died in prison.

One of the latest death in prison (last Good Friday, March 29, at the SICA jail) was that of Intong Amirol, past 70 years, who suffered a hypertensive stroke more than two years ago and became totally paralyzed and bedridden since then. He was not brought to any hospital or given adequate medical attention, and had to totally rely on his cellmates for full-time caregiving, feeding him, helping him with his toilet functions and washing him – – all in bed. His family could not assist him at all or even just visit him, as they are poor and too far away. State authorities were asked to release him, as his precarious health condition would surely only deteriorate much further in jail, and as his further detention was not only inhuman, but illegal, since he was totally innocent of the charges against him. But the indifference finally killed him. He was just a Muslim Imam, who depended mainly on coconut farming and copra production for a living in his farm in Lumbang, Isabela City, and also devoted time to actively assisting Christian priests administering and teaching at the Claret High School in Tumahobong, Sumipsip, Basilan. He was in no way connected with the Abu Sayyaf terrorist bandits operating in the mountain areas. But he was arrested as “Intong Aninol,” a full-time Abu Sayyaf Group bandit. A huge bounty was collected for his arrest in the name of that other person.

He had been detained for more than a decade. But, since then, his case hardly moved at all and was totally at a standstill for more than a decade until his death.

Intong Amirol was just one of hundreds of ordinary community folk arrested arbitrarily and erroneously, with huge bounties paid to arrestors, tortured in an effort to force them to admit to crimes they did not commit, detained indefinitely and swamped with trumped-up criminal charges attributed to them as other persons or as some aliases in the lists of those “wanted by law” for “terrorist acts.”

Stretching further the injuries to practically all of more than 400 political prisoners at present in the country, justice has crawled exceedingly slow – – actually one of the slowest in the world – – and, in many cases, has not moved at all for years and even up to a decade or more, rampantly and gravely violating human rights and the law on speedy trial.

The mendicant, rotten, aloof and repressive character, attitude and practice of the ruling state, its military, police and jail authorities, and its justice system, have been at the root of all these problems victimizing not only political prisoners and those aspiring and struggling for socio-economic, political, judicial and other basic reforms, but also victimizing many innocents and, more broadly, the great mass of the Filipino people.

In the face of all this, the need for decisive, radical, fundamental reforms in the state, government, justice system and the whole of society has been all the more urgent.

ALAN JAZMINES
NDF Peace Consultant
detained at the Special Intensive Care Area (SICA)
Camp Bagong Diwa, Bicutan,
Taguig City
10 July 2013

Press Statement

Opening Statement

Two Proposals for a Just and Lasting Peace

PRESS STATEMENT
27 July 2010

**Two proposals for a just and lasting peace**

By Prof. JOSE MARIA SISON
Chief Political Consultant
NDFP Negotiating Panel

The Negotiating Panel of the National Democratic Front of the
Philippines (NDFP) has repeatedly declared its readiness to resume
peace negotiations with the Government of the Republic of the
Philippines (GRP) under the Aquino II administration. It has also
signalled its willingness to receive in The Netherlands or Norway a
senior emissary or a team of emissaries of said administration to
discuss the possible course and perspective of the GRP-NDFP peace
negotiations.

On my part, as Chief Political Consultant of the NDFP Negotiating
Panel, I have long proposed the resumption and acceleration of the
GRP-NDFP peace negotiations, especially with regard to social and
economic reforms, in accordance with The Hague Joint Declaration and
subsequent major agreements.

I have also gone so far as to propose a concept of immediate truce
and alliance on the basis of a mutually acceptable declaration of
principles and policies upholding national independence and democracy,
confronting the basic problems of the Filipino people and adopting
effective measures of social, economic and political reforms. It is
unjust for anyone to expect that the revolutionary forces and the
people to simply cease fire and surrender to a rotten ruling system
that shuns patriotic and progressive demands and refuses to engage in
basic reforms.

I hope that the Aquino II administration can consider seriously the
two proposals for the benefit of the people. Like the NDFP, I welcome
any serious step of said administration towards the attainment of a
just peace and national unity by addressing the roots of the armed
conflict and arriving with the revolutionary forces and the people at
agreements on basic social, economic and political reforms.

I urge the Aquino II administration to override such
counterrevolutionary notions as those previously spelled out by its
officials that the military can get anything it wants despite the
severe economic crisis and bankruptcy of the reactionary government,
that the revolutionary forces and people surrender and that they can
be destroyed and pacified in the next three years.

I challenge the Aquino II administration to reject the US
Counterinsurgency Guide and take the path of seeking a concord of just
peace and national unity with the NDFP by addressing the roots of the
armed conflict and forging agreements on social, economic and
political reforms. It is malicious and unjust to construe the people’s
resistance to injustice, oppression and exploitation as the problem
rather than as the consequence of foreign and feudal domination.

Such monstrous problems as foreign monopoly capitalism, domestic
feudalism and bureaucratic corruption are the longrunning and current
causes of underdevelopment, unemployment, poverty and misery. All
well-meaning forces and people must unite and work together to
confront and solve these problems and work for a new and better
Philippines that is truly free and democratic, socially just,
progressive and peaceful.